Go to Top

Into the 1990, Lucia returned to the Philippines and suggested to petition appellant to participate her within the Canada

Into the 1990, Lucia returned to the Philippines and suggested to petition appellant to participate her within the Canada

MORIGO Versus. People

FACTS: One another provided to get married, thus they were married on August 30, 1990 at the Iglesia de Filipina Nacionalat Catagdaan, Pilar, Bohol.

On August 19, 1991, Lucia filed towards the Ontario Court (Standard Department) a beneficial petition to have split up facing appellant which had been provided by the judge on January 17, 1992 and to take effect on February 17, 1992.

On October 4, 1992, appellant Lucio Morigo hitched Maria Jececha Lumbago at the Virgen sa Barangay Parish, Tagbilaran City, Bohol.

On September 21, 1993, implicated registered a problem to have official statement off nullity of wedding from the Local Demo Courtroom of Bohol, docketed because the Civil Instance Zero. 6020. The brand new problem find (sic) yet others, the statement away from nullity of accused’s matrimony with Lucia, on to the floor you to definitely no marriage service indeed occurred.

ISSUE: Acquired Morigo need to have registered declaration toward nullity of their relationship with Barrete ahead of their second y instance.

RATIO: Within the idea of retroactivity of a wedding being declared emptiness ab initio, the 2 had been never ever married right away. Brand new contract from relationships was null; it bears no judge feeling. Providing this argument in order to their logical completion, to own courtroom intentions, petitioner was not hitched so you can Lucia at that time the guy developed the marriage that have Maria Jececha. The new existence while the validity of the earliest relationships getting a keen essential section of new offense of bigamy, it’s however, logical you to a conviction to possess said crime try not to become sustained where there is no very first relationships to dicuss from. The petitioner, need, perforce be acquitted of your instant charge.

The present case is analogous to, but must be distinguished from Mercado v. Tan . . In the latter case, the judicial declaration of nullity of the first marriage was likewise obtained after the second marriage was already celebrated. We held therein that:

A judicial declaration out of nullity regarding a past wedding is required just before a consequent one can possibly be lawfully developed. This concept is applicable even if the before partnership are described as regulations while the emptiness.

It carries worrying though you to within the Mercado, the initial marriage got solemnized not simply once, however, double: very first before a judge in which a married relationship certificate is properly issued following once again Kalgoorlie hookup ads six months later on in advance of a priest for the spiritual rites. Basically, at least, the first matrimony did actually possess transpired, regardless if later on stated emptiness ab initio.

Individual that adopts a following wedding versus basic getting eg judicial y

About quick instance, yet not, no wedding ceremony at all was performed because of the a properly authorized solemnizing manager. Petitioner and you can Lucia Barrete simply closed a marriage package on the very own. The fresh new mere private work off signing a married relationship price holds zero semblance so you can a valid relationship for example, means no judicial report regarding nullity. Instance work by yourself, versus far more, cannot be considered so you can make up an evidently valid matrimony where petitioner could well be held responsible for bigamy except if the guy basic protects an official declaration away from nullity prior to he contracts a consequent relationships.

The law abhors an injustice and the Court is mandated to liberally construe a penal statute in favor of an accused and weigh every circumstance in favor of the presumption of innocence to ensure that justice is done. Within the products of one’s introduce instance, we held one petitioner have not the amount of time bigamy. Further, we also find that we need not tarry on the issue of the validity of his defense of good faith or lack of criminal intent, which is now moot and academic.